It is both readable and legible. The curvature is very me. It is both aesthetically pleasing and easy on the eye.
IN WHAT WAYS IS IT EFFECTIVE, AND IN WHAT WAY IS IT INEFFECTIVE OF REPRESENTING YOU?
Taking all things into consideration about what i have learnt from this experience, i think it is highly improbable that designing a typeface that is representational of all aspects of somebodies personality will be neither effective, readable or legible. I think given the adjectives that were selected i feel the typeface works on all levels. I think the thinner weight stokes that surround the heavier inner weight stokes are a good representation that i am perhaps contained and a little quiet. The curvature of the typeface is suggestive of a gentle, non aggressive nature. The only criticism i have is that it perhaps is a bit to feminine-esk.
DESCRIBE WHAT YOU THINK OF THE TYPEFACE.
ReplyDeleteIt is both readable and legible.
The curvature is very me.
It is both aesthetically pleasing and easy on the eye.
IN WHAT WAYS IS IT EFFECTIVE, AND IN WHAT WAY IS IT INEFFECTIVE OF REPRESENTING YOU?
Taking all things into consideration about what i have learnt from this experience, i think it is highly improbable that designing a typeface that is representational of all aspects of somebodies personality will be neither effective, readable or legible.
I think given the adjectives that were selected i feel the typeface works on all levels. I think the thinner weight stokes that surround the heavier inner weight stokes are a good representation that i am perhaps contained and a little quiet. The curvature of the typeface is suggestive of a gentle, non aggressive nature. The only criticism i have is that it perhaps is a bit to feminine-esk.
Strokes* typo error. x2
ReplyDelete